D McLAUGHLIN & SONS LTD AGAINST EAST AYRSHIRE COUNCIL [2020] ScotCS CSOH_109 (30 December 2020)
The adjudicator's decision is enforceable unless challenged on jurisdiction or natural justice grounds; errors of law or fact do not permit challenge. The Final Certificate was not conclusive evidence in the adjudication because it was timeously challenged in the sheriff court action, removing its conclusivity for both the litigation and adjudication. The defender cannot recover adjudicator's fees as such fees are incidental and not subject to restitution. The court does not recognise the English 'exception' for manifest errors as a defence to enforcement in this case.
- Citation
- [2020] ScotCS CSOH_109
- Parties
- Pursuer: D McLaughlin & Sons Limited; Defender: East Ayrshire Council
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 30 December 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Enforcement Action / Judgment on Enforcement and Counterclaim
- Outcome
- Adjudicator's decision enforced; defender's counterclaim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Adjudication Enforcement, Final Certificate Conclusivity, Interim Payment Notices, Counterclaims, Restitution of Adjudicator's Fees
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
D McLaughlin & Sons Limited
Pursuer
East Ayrshire Council
Defender
Procedural Posture
Commercial Enforcement Action / Judgment on Enforcement and Counterclaim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether errors of law or fact by an adjudicator permit challenge to enforcement of adjudicator's decision
- 2 Whether the Final Certificate is conclusive evidence precluding enforcement of the adjudicator's award
- 3 Whether the defender can recover adjudicator's fees via counterclaim
Ratio Decidendi
The adjudicator's decision is enforceable unless challenged on jurisdiction or natural justice grounds; errors of law or fact do not permit challenge. The Final Certificate was not conclusive evidence in the adjudication because it was timeously challenged in the sheriff court action, removing its conclusivity for both the litigation and adjudication. The defender cannot recover adjudicator's fees as such fees are incidental and not subject to restitution. The court does not recognise the English 'exception' for manifest errors as a defence to enforcement in this case.
Court Disposition
Adjudicator's decision enforced; defender's counterclaim dismissed
Orders
- Defender ordered to pay pursuer £427,578.75 plus VAT (£513,094.50 total)
- Defender ordered to pay interest of £78,361.18 up to date of decision, increasing daily by £61.46 until payment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment