NIMMO, CA, ADMINISTRATOR OF DAWSON INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY [2018] ScotCS CSOH_52 (30 May 2018)
The directions sought by the administrator, insofar as they require the Scottish court to determine whether the company or administrator is an 'appropriate person' under English environmental law or to rule on substantive environmental liabilities, are not competent subjects for directions under paragraph 63 of Schedule B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986. The court's function is not to adjudicate on uncrystallised or contingent claims where the statutory process for liability has not been completed and no claim has been lodged. The Scottish court will not grant directions that would pre-empt the outcome of English statutory procedures or confer immunity on the administrator for future...
- Citation
- [2018] ScotCS CSOH_52
- Parties
- Noter: Blair Carnegie Nimmo, CA, administrator of Dawson International Public Limited Company; First Respondent: Environment Agency; Second Respondent: Tweedside Independent Traders Ltd; Third Respondent: Pension Protection Fund
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 30 May 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Directions in Administration (insolvency) / Debate on Competency and Relevancy of Directions Sought
- Outcome
- Prayer of the Note refused; directions sought not granted.
- Legal Topics
- Administrator's Powers and Duties, Contaminated Land Liability, Jurisdiction of Scottish Courts, Provable Debts and Administration Expenses, Standing of Potential Creditors
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Blair Carnegie Nimmo, CA, administrator of Dawson International Public Limited Company
Noter
Environment Agency
First Respondent
Tweedside Independent Traders Ltd
Second Respondent
Pension Protection Fund
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Directions in Administration (insolvency) / Debate on Competency and Relevancy of Directions Sought
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the directions sought by the administrator are competent under paragraph 63 of Schedule B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986
- 2 Whether the Scottish court has jurisdiction to determine issues of English environmental law liability
- 3 Whether the Environment Agency has or could have a claim as a creditor in the administration
Ratio Decidendi
The directions sought by the administrator, insofar as they require the Scottish court to determine whether the company or administrator is an 'appropriate person' under English environmental law or to rule on substantive environmental liabilities, are not competent subjects for directions under paragraph 63 of Schedule B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986. The court's function is not to adjudicate on uncrystallised or contingent claims where the statutory process for liability has not been completed and no claim has been lodged. The Scottish court will not grant directions that would pre-empt the outcome of English statutory procedures or confer immunity on the administrator for future...
Court Disposition
Prayer of the Note refused; directions sought not granted.
Orders
- The directions sought by the administrator are refused as incompetent or premature.
- No order as to the substantive environmental liability or status of the Environment Agency as creditor.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment