Petition West Lothian Council v. M. Mcg, W.p., J.f.f.& Anor [2002] ScotCS 133 (10th May, 2002)
The sheriff erred in law in holding that the fathers failed to fulfil parental responsibilities prior to acquiring them by statutory agreement, but was entitled to find that the fathers unreasonably withheld consent to adoption, judged by the objective standard of the reasonable parent with the child's welfare as paramount. The appeals were refused as the sheriff's overall decision was justified on the facts and law, and there was no basis for interference.
- Citation
- [2002] ScotCS 130
- Parties
- Petitioner and Respondent: West Lothian Council; First Respondent and Appellant (mother): M. McG or P; Second Respondent and Appellant (father of D W P): W. B. P; Third Respondent and Appellant (father of J M F): J. F. F; Minuters: The Scottish Ministers
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Sheriffdom (adoption/freeing Orders) / Appeal Judgment From Inner House, Court of Session
- Outcome
- Appeals refused; sheriff's orders affirmed with minor amendment to findings.
- Legal Topics
- Adoption, Freeing Orders, Parental Consent, Parental Responsibilities and Rights, European Convention on Human Rights (article 8), Contact With Birth Parents
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
West Lothian Council
Petitioner and Respondent
M. McG or P
First Respondent and Appellant (mother)
W. B. P
Second Respondent and Appellant (father of D W P)
J. F. F
Third Respondent and Appellant (father of J M F)
The Scottish Ministers
Minuters
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Sheriffdom (adoption/freeing Orders) / Appeal Judgment From Inner House, Court of Session
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sheriff erred in holding that the fathers failed to fulfil parental responsibilities under the Adoption (Scotland) Act 1978
- 2 Whether the sheriff erred in holding that the fathers unreasonably withheld consent to adoption
- 3 Whether the sheriff erred in exercising discretion to dispense with parental consent
Ratio Decidendi
The sheriff erred in law in holding that the fathers failed to fulfil parental responsibilities prior to acquiring them by statutory agreement, but was entitled to find that the fathers unreasonably withheld consent to adoption, judged by the objective standard of the reasonable parent with the child's welfare as paramount. The appeals were refused as the sheriff's overall decision was justified on the facts and law, and there was no basis for interference.
Court Disposition
Appeals refused; sheriff's orders affirmed with minor amendment to findings.
Orders
- Amend sheriff's findings in fact and law numbers (4) and (13) by inserting 'not' after 'has' to correct error on parental responsibilities.
- Refuse both appeals.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment