A B and C (children), Re Petition for an Order Freeing the Children for Adoption [2004] ScotCS 147 (22 June 2004)
The court found that the respondents had persistently failed, without reasonable cause, to fulfil their parental responsibilities to safeguard and promote the children's health, development and welfare, as evidenced by a sustained pattern of inadequate care, failure to follow advice, and lack of progress despite intensive support. The court further found that the respondents were unreasonably withholding consent to adoption, as no reasonable parent would do so in the circumstances. The welfare of the children required that they be freed for adoption, and the statutory criteria for dispensing with parental consent were met.
- Citation
- [2004] ScotCS 147
- Parties
- Petitioner: Aberdeenshire Council; First Respondent (mother): [First Respondent: Name not provided]; Second Respondent (father): [Second Respondent: Name not provided]
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 22 June 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Petition for Order Freeing Children for Adoption / Judgment After Proof Hearing
- Outcome
- Petition granted; children freed for adoption; parental consent dispensed with.
- Legal Topics
- Adoption, Parental Rights, Child Welfare, Dispensing With Parental Consent
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Aberdeenshire Council
Petitioner
[First Respondent: Name not provided]
First Respondent (mother)
[Second Respondent: Name not provided]
Second Respondent (father)
Procedural Posture
Petition for Order Freeing Children for Adoption / Judgment After Proof Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondents' consent to freeing the children for adoption should be dispensed with under the Adoption (Scotland) Act 1978, s.16(2)
- 2 Whether the respondents persistently failed, without reasonable cause, to fulfil parental responsibilities to safeguard and promote the children's health, development and welfare
- 3 Whether the respondents are unreasonably withholding consent to adoption
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondents had persistently failed, without reasonable cause, to fulfil their parental responsibilities to safeguard and promote the children's health, development and welfare, as evidenced by a sustained pattern of inadequate care, failure to follow advice, and lack of progress despite intensive support. The court further found that the respondents were unreasonably withholding consent to adoption, as no reasonable parent would do so in the circumstances. The welfare of the children required that they be freed for adoption, and the statutory criteria for dispensing with parental consent were met.
Court Disposition
Petition granted; children freed for adoption; parental consent dispensed with.
Orders
- The children A, B, and C are declared free for adoption.
- The agreement of the respondents to the making of adoption orders is dispensed with.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment