A. F. Craig & Co., Ltd v. A. F. & J. C. Blackater [1923] ScotLR 292 (09 February 1923)
Where an agent contracts for an undisclosed principal and is subsequently sued to judgment for the contract price after disclosure of the principal, the agent is entitled to sue for damages for breach of contract in a representative capacity for the principal. The election by the other party to treat the agent as liable under the contract entitles the agent to enforce all rights under the contract, including counterclaims for damages suffered by the principal. The technical plea of 'no title to sue' cannot be sustained in these circumstances.
- Citation
- [1923] ScotLR 292
- Parties
- Pursuer/respondent: A. F. Craig & Company, Limited; Defender/reclaimer: A. F. & J. C. Blackater
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 09 February 1923
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (contract/dispute) / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary to Inner House
- Outcome
- Interlocutor of the Lord Ordinary recalled; case remitted for assessment of damages in the counter-action.
- Legal Topics
- Agent's Rights, Undisclosed Principal, Title to Sue, Election in Contract Enforcement, Damages for Breach of Contract
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A. F. Craig & Company, Limited
Pursuer/respondent
A. F. & J. C. Blackater
Defender/reclaimer
Procedural Posture
Civil (contract/dispute) / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary to Inner House
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an agent for an undisclosed principal, after disclosure, has title to sue for damages for breach of contract when the other party has elected to sue the agent to judgment for the contract price.
- 2 Whether the agent can counterclaim for damages suffered by the principal after being sued for the contract price.
Ratio Decidendi
Where an agent contracts for an undisclosed principal and is subsequently sued to judgment for the contract price after disclosure of the principal, the agent is entitled to sue for damages for breach of contract in a representative capacity for the principal. The election by the other party to treat the agent as liable under the contract entitles the agent to enforce all rights under the contract, including counterclaims for damages suffered by the principal. The technical plea of 'no title to sue' cannot be sustained in these circumstances.
Court Disposition
Interlocutor of the Lord Ordinary recalled; case remitted for assessment of damages in the counter-action.
Orders
- Recall of Lord Ordinary's interlocutor dismissing Blackaters' action for damages.
- Remit to Lord Ordinary to assess damages due to Blackaters in the counter-action.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment