ROBB'S TRUST, THE GOVERNORS OF, AGAINST DAVID ALLAN EDWARDS [2015] ScotCS CSIH_39 (26 May 2015)
The operation of a notice to quit under the Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Act 1991 is suspended by arbitration until the arbiter’s award is issued; therefore, the tenancy and rent obligations continue until that date. The notice to quit does not become operative, and the tenancy does not end, until the suspension is lifted by the arbiter’s award.
- Citation
- [2015] ScotCS CSIH_39
- Parties
- Pursuers and Appellants: The Governors of Robb’s Trust; Defender and Respondent: David Allan Edwards
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 26 May 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment of the Inner House, Court of Session
- Outcome
- Appeal refused; interlocutor of the sheriff principal adhered to.
- Legal Topics
- Agricultural Tenancies, Notices to Quit, Statutory Interpretation, Suspension of Notice Operation, Lease Termination
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Governors of Robb’s Trust
Pursuers and Appellants
David Allan Edwards
Defender and Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment of the Inner House, Court of Session
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether, under the Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Act 1991, section 23(4), the lease and rent obligations continue until the date of the arbiter’s award when a notice to quit is disputed and proceeds to arbitration.
Ratio Decidendi
The operation of a notice to quit under the Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Act 1991 is suspended by arbitration until the arbiter’s award is issued; therefore, the tenancy and rent obligations continue until that date. The notice to quit does not become operative, and the tenancy does not end, until the suspension is lifted by the arbiter’s award.
Court Disposition
Appeal refused; interlocutor of the sheriff principal adhered to.
Orders
- Refusal of the landlords’ appeal.
- Affirmation of the sheriff principal’s interlocutor dated 25 March 2014.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment