MURIAL VERGARA AGAINST RYANAIR Ltd [2014] ScotSC 80 (06 August 2014)
A claim for compensation under EU Regulation 261/2004 is not a claim for damages and is not subject to the two-year contractual limitation period in Ryanair's General Conditions of Carriage. The right to compensation under the Regulation arises irrespective of negligence or breach of contract, and the contractual limitation clause does not apply to such claims.
- Citation
- [2014] ScotSC 80
- Parties
- Pursuer and Appellant: Murial Vergara and Murial Vergara as legal representative of her son Brodie-Gael Vergara Morrison; Defender and Respondent: Ryanair Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 06 August 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Small Claims Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff to Sheriff Principal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; action not time barred; case remitted to sheriff for further proceedings.
- Legal Topics
- Air Passenger Rights, Limitation of Actions, Interpretation of Contractual Terms, EU Regulation 261/2004, Unfair Contract Terms
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Murial Vergara and Murial Vergara as legal representative of her son Brodie-Gael Vergara Morrison
Pursuer and Appellant
Ryanair Limited
Defender and Respondent
Procedural Posture
Small Claims Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff to Sheriff Principal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a claim for compensation under EU Regulation 261/2004 is time barred by a two-year contractual limitation period in Ryanair's General Conditions of Carriage
- 2 Whether 'compensation' under the Regulation is equivalent to 'damages' under the contract
- 3 Whether the contractual limitation clause is consistent with EU Regulation 261/2004
Ratio Decidendi
A claim for compensation under EU Regulation 261/2004 is not a claim for damages and is not subject to the two-year contractual limitation period in Ryanair's General Conditions of Carriage. The right to compensation under the Regulation arises irrespective of negligence or breach of contract, and the contractual limitation clause does not apply to such claims.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; action not time barred; case remitted to sheriff for further proceedings.
Orders
- Recall of sheriff’s interlocutor of 23 January 2014
- Remit to sheriff to determine if cancellation was caused by extraordinary circumstances
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment