Sellar v Greater Glasgow Health Board [2017] ScotCS CSOH_56 (31 March 2017)
The proposed amendment introduces a radically different case after the expiry of the triennium, which would be prejudicial to the defenders and defeat the protection of limitation statutes; there is no compelling reason or unusual circumstance to justify allowing the amendment.
- Citation
- [2017] ScotCS CSOH_56
- Parties
- Pursuer: James Kerr Sellar; Defenders: Greater Glasgow Health Board
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 31 March 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Medical Negligence Action / Opposed Motion to Allow Minute of Amendment
- Outcome
- Pursuer's motion to have the Minute of Amendment received is refused.
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Pleadings, Limitation of Actions, Medical Malpractice, Court Discretion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Kerr Sellar
Pursuer
Greater Glasgow Health Board
Defenders
Procedural Posture
Medical Negligence Action / Opposed Motion to Allow Minute of Amendment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed amendment introduces a new case after the triennium
- 2 Whether the amendment should be refused as irrelevant or prejudicial due to delay
Ratio Decidendi
The proposed amendment introduces a radically different case after the expiry of the triennium, which would be prejudicial to the defenders and defeat the protection of limitation statutes; there is no compelling reason or unusual circumstance to justify allowing the amendment.
Court Disposition
Pursuer's motion to have the Minute of Amendment received is refused.
Orders
- Order of consent for expenses of the hearings on 12 May and 29 June 2016 in favour of the defenders.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment