Dundee Car Service Ltd v. Scanlan & Anor [2006] ScotSC 78 (27 October 2006)
The Sheriff Principal held that, notwithstanding arguments based on MacIver and Rodenhurst, he was bound by the authority of Forbes v Forbes, which directly addresses the issue and holds that appeals against a sheriff's sentence for contempt or breach of interdict are only competent to the Court of Session. The appeal was therefore incompetent.
- Citation
- [2006] ScotSC 78
- Parties
- Pursuer and Respondent: Dundee Car Service Centre Limited; First Defender and Appellant: Bernard Scanlan; Second Defender and Respondent: Dundee Car Valet Centre Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 27 October 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Sheriff Principal Judgment on Competency of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed as incompetent
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Competency, Contempt of Court, Breach of Interdict
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dundee Car Service Centre Limited
Pursuer and Respondent
Bernard Scanlan
First Defender and Appellant
Dundee Car Valet Centre Limited
Second Defender and Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Sheriff Principal Judgment on Competency of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an appeal against a sheriff's sentence for breach of interim interdict is competent before the sheriff principal
Ratio Decidendi
The Sheriff Principal held that, notwithstanding arguments based on MacIver and Rodenhurst, he was bound by the authority of Forbes v Forbes, which directly addresses the issue and holds that appeals against a sheriff's sentence for contempt or breach of interdict are only competent to the Court of Session. The appeal was therefore incompetent.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed as incompetent
Orders
- Appeal dismissed as incompetent
- Expenses of the appeal reserved for later determination
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment