Taylor v. Macilwain [1900] ScotLR 38_1 (18 October 1900)
Where the Act of Sederunt prescribes a mandatory time limit for lodging appeal papers and specifies that failure results in abandonment of the appeal, the Court has no power to dispense with compliance except as expressly provided. The appellant failed to comply and did not apply for relief within the permitted period; therefore, the appeal is abandoned.
- Citation
- [1900] ScotLR 38_1
- Parties
- Pursuer/appellant: Taylor; Defender/respondent: Macilwain
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 18 October 1900
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Sheriff Court (lanarkshire) / Interlocutory Appeal—competency Objection
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed as incompetent due to abandonment; objection to competency sustained.
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Procedure, Acts of Sederunt, Time Limits, Abandonment of Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Taylor
Pursuer/appellant
Macilwain
Defender/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Sheriff Court (lanarkshire) / Interlocutory Appeal—competency Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether failure to lodge print of appeal papers within statutory time limit results in abandonment of appeal
- 2 Whether the Court has discretion to relax procedural requirements of Act of Sederunt 10th March 1870, section 3, sub-sections 2 and 3
Ratio Decidendi
Where the Act of Sederunt prescribes a mandatory time limit for lodging appeal papers and specifies that failure results in abandonment of the appeal, the Court has no power to dispense with compliance except as expressly provided. The appellant failed to comply and did not apply for relief within the permitted period; therefore, the appeal is abandoned.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed as incompetent due to abandonment; objection to competency sustained.
Orders
- Clerk to re-transmit process to Sheriff-Clerk due to abandonment of appeal.
- Pursuer found liable to defender in expenses of the discussion, modified at £2, 2s.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment