Keenan v. Sanghera [2005] ScotSC 36 (07 July 2005)
The appeal was incompetent because the interlocutor of 10 January 2005 was not one appealable without leave under section 27 of the 1907 Act, and no leave to appeal had been granted by the sheriff. The sheriff's decision on the amendment procedure was within his powers and not itself incompetent.
- Citation
- [2005] ScotSC 36
- Parties
- Pursuer and Appellant: Alan Keenan; Defender and Respondent: Baljinder Singh Sanghera
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 07 July 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (landlord and Tenant) / Appeal Against Interlocutor Regarding Amendment Procedure and Counterclaim
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed as incompetent
- Legal Topics
- Appeals, Competency of Interlocutors, Amendment Procedure, Counterclaims, Leave to Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alan Keenan
Pursuer and Appellant
Baljinder Singh Sanghera
Defender and Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil (landlord and Tenant) / Appeal Against Interlocutor Regarding Amendment Procedure and Counterclaim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sheriff's interlocutor of 10 January 2005 was incompetent for allowing a counterclaim to be introduced in answers to a minute of amendment without leave of the court
- 2 Whether leave to appeal was required under section 27 of the Sheriff Courts (Scotland) Act 1907
- 3 Whether the sheriff principal had jurisdiction to entertain the appeal without leave
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was incompetent because the interlocutor of 10 January 2005 was not one appealable without leave under section 27 of the 1907 Act, and no leave to appeal had been granted by the sheriff. The sheriff's decision on the amendment procedure was within his powers and not itself incompetent.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed as incompetent
Orders
- Refuses the motion to remit to the sheriff for consideration of late application for leave to appeal
- Dismisses the appeal as incompetent
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment