Appeal by Kenneth Prentice against Chief Constable of the Police Service of Scotland (Sheriff Appeal Court Civil) [2025] SACCIV 18 (08 November 2024)
The restriction in the Firearms Act 1968 on appeals 'only on a point of law' applies to the substantive decision regarding the firearm certificate, not to incidental matters such as expenses. The sheriff retains common law discretion over expenses, and appeals on expenses are not limited to points of law but are discouraged unless there is a miscarriage of justice.
- Citation
- [2025] SACCIV 18
- Parties
- Pursuer and Appellant: Kenneth Prentice; Defender and Respondent: Chief Constable of the Police Service of Scotland
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 08 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Competency Hearing on Appeal Against Sheriff's Decision on Expenses
- Outcome
- Appeal held competent; assigned to Chapter 8 procedure for hearing on merits; expenses reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Appeals on Expenses, Firearms Act 1968, Judicial Discretion on Costs, Competency of Appeal, Public Authority Costs Immunity
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kenneth Prentice
Pursuer and Appellant
Chief Constable of the Police Service of Scotland
Defender and Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Competency Hearing on Appeal Against Sheriff's Decision on Expenses
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an appeal against a sheriff's decision on expenses in a firearms licensing case is competent under the Firearms Act 1968
- 2 Whether the sheriff erred in law by not awarding expenses to the appellant based on alleged improper motive or bad faith by the respondent
Ratio Decidendi
The restriction in the Firearms Act 1968 on appeals 'only on a point of law' applies to the substantive decision regarding the firearm certificate, not to incidental matters such as expenses. The sheriff retains common law discretion over expenses, and appeals on expenses are not limited to points of law but are discouraged unless there is a miscarriage of justice.
Court Disposition
Appeal held competent; assigned to Chapter 8 procedure for hearing on merits; expenses reserved.
Orders
- The appeal is competent and will proceed to a hearing on the merits under Chapter 8 procedure.
- All issues of expenses arising from the competency hearing are reserved.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment