Stiell Facilities Ltd v Sir Robert Mcalpine Ltd [2001] ScotCS 203 (8 August 2001)
Arrestments on the dependence recalled because pursuers do not have a colourable or stateable case; their title to sue is contingent on the outcome of separate rectification proceedings and they are not the named party in the relevant sub-contract.
- Citation
- [2001] ScotCS 203
- Parties
- Pursuer: Stiell Facilities Limited; Defender: Sir Robert McAlpine Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 08 August 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Motion for Recall of Arrestments on the Dependence / Vacation Court Hearing Prior to Summons Calling
- Outcome
- Motion granted; arrestments on the dependence recalled.
- Legal Topics
- Arrestment on the Dependence, Title to Sue, Oppressive Diligence, Sub Contract Payment Dispute
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stiell Facilities Limited
Pursuer
Sir Robert McAlpine Limited
Defender
Procedural Posture
Motion for Recall of Arrestments on the Dependence / Vacation Court Hearing Prior to Summons Calling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether arrestments on the dependence are nimious and oppressive
- 2 Whether pursuers have a colourable or stateable case for payment under the sub-contract
Ratio Decidendi
Arrestments on the dependence recalled because pursuers do not have a colourable or stateable case; their title to sue is contingent on the outcome of separate rectification proceedings and they are not the named party in the relevant sub-contract.
Court Disposition
Motion granted; arrestments on the dependence recalled.
Orders
- Recall of arrestments on the dependence
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment