COUNTY PROPERTIES LIMITED v. THE SCOTTISH MINISTERS FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW [2001] ScotHC 87 (16th August, 2001)
The procedures for determining listed building consent by the Scottish Ministers, including the appointment of a Reporter, do not inherently breach Article 6(1) ECHR because the process as a whole, including the right of judicial review, provides sufficient safeguards to ensure compatibility. The lack of independence at the administrative stage is not fatal, as the courts have adequate powers to review justiciable issues. The case is not distinguishable in principle from the House of Lords decision in Alconbury.
- Citation
- [2001] ScotHC 87
- Parties
- Petitioners and Respondents: County Properties Limited; Respondents and Reclaimers: The Scottish Ministers; Intervener: Advocate General for Scotland
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Reclaiming Motion (appeal) From Lord Ordinary's Interlocutor
- Outcome
- Petition dismissed; Lord Ordinary's interlocutor recalled.
- Legal Topics
- Article 6 ECHR Right to a Fair Hearing, Listed Building Consent, Independence and Impartiality of Tribunals, Judicial Review of Administrative Decisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
County Properties Limited
Petitioners and Respondents
The Scottish Ministers
Respondents and Reclaimers
Advocate General for Scotland
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Reclaiming Motion (appeal) From Lord Ordinary's Interlocutor
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the decision-making process for listed building consent by the Scottish Ministers and their appointed Reporter is compatible with Article 6(1) ECHR
- 2 Whether the process provides an independent and impartial tribunal as required by Article 6(1)
- 3 Whether the right of appeal to the courts is sufficient to cure any incompatibility
Ratio Decidendi
The procedures for determining listed building consent by the Scottish Ministers, including the appointment of a Reporter, do not inherently breach Article 6(1) ECHR because the process as a whole, including the right of judicial review, provides sufficient safeguards to ensure compatibility. The lack of independence at the administrative stage is not fatal, as the courts have adequate powers to review justiciable issues. The case is not distinguishable in principle from the House of Lords decision in Alconbury.
Court Disposition
Petition dismissed; Lord Ordinary's interlocutor recalled.
Orders
- Recall the Lord Ordinary's interlocutor of 25 July 2000.
- Dismiss the petition.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment