KENNETH SMITH v. DIRECT LINE INSURANCE PLC [2011] ScotSC 177 (14 November 2011)
The Sheriff's award of £2,000 for solatium was within the reasonable bracket for the injury suffered, based on the facts as found, including the limited duration and impact of symptoms, and was not plainly wrong or unreasonable; therefore, there was no basis for appellate interference.
- Citation
- [2011] ScotSC 177
- Parties
- Pursuer and Appellant: Kenneth Smith; Defenders and Respondents: Direct Line Insurance PLC
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 14 November 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Summary Cause (personal Injury) / Appeal From Sheriff to Sheriff Principal
- Outcome
- Appeal refused; Sheriff's decision affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Assessment of Damages, Judicial Discretion, Road Traffic Accident, Solatium, Appeal Standards
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kenneth Smith
Pursuer and Appellant
Direct Line Insurance PLC
Defenders and Respondents
Procedural Posture
Summary Cause (personal Injury) / Appeal From Sheriff to Sheriff Principal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Sheriff's award of £2,000 for solatium was plainly wrong or unreasonable and should be interfered with on appeal
- 2 Whether the Sheriff attached insufficient weight to medical evidence and absence from work
Ratio Decidendi
The Sheriff's award of £2,000 for solatium was within the reasonable bracket for the injury suffered, based on the facts as found, including the limited duration and impact of symptoms, and was not plainly wrong or unreasonable; therefore, there was no basis for appellate interference.
Court Disposition
Appeal refused; Sheriff's decision affirmed.
Orders
- Appellant found liable to respondents in the expenses of the appeal as assessed.
- Remit to Sheriff Clerk to fix a diet of assessment in respect of the expenses of the principal action and the appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment