MR A.P. AND MRS. M.P. AGAINST D.O. AND S.O. [2014] ScotSC 79 (06 August 2014)

MR A.P. AND MRS. M.P. AGAINST D.O. AND S.O. [2014] ScotSC 79 (06 August 2014)

The pursuers failed to establish entitlement to recover possession under Grounds 1(b), 11, and 12 as they did not genuinely require the property as their principal home, there were no arrears or persistent delay in paying rent, and the agreed rent was paid. Ground 17 did not apply as there was no contract of employment. Ground 13 could potentially apply as the provision of services formed part of the tenancy, but as the services were not specified in writing as required by section 21 of the Tenures Abolition Act 1746, the obligation could not be enforced for damages but could be considered for recovery of possession. The parties settled after the court ruled on this point, so no final...

Citation
[2014] ScotSC 79
Parties
Pursuers: Mr A. P. and Mrs M. P.; Defenders: D. O. and S. O.
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
06 August 2014
Procedural Posture
Summary Cause for Recovery of Possession of Heritable Property / Judgment After Proof
Outcome
Action settled after ruling on legal issues; no order for recovery of possession made.
Legal Topics
Assured Tenancy, Statutory Assured Tenancy, Grounds for Recovery of Possession, Verbal Lease, Rent and Services as Consideration, Notice Requirements, Section 21 Tenures Abolition Act 1746
Landlord and Tenant Property Law Housing Law Assured Tenancy Statutory Assured Tenancy Grounds for Recovery of Possession Verbal Lease Rent and Services as Consideration +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr A. P. and Mrs M. P.

Pursuers

D. O. and S. O.

Defenders

Procedural Posture

Summary Cause for Recovery of Possession of Heritable Property / Judgment After Proof

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the pursuers are entitled to recover possession of the property under any of the statutory grounds in schedule 5 to the Housing (Scotland) Act 1988
  2. 2 Whether the tenancy was contractual or statutory assured
  3. 3 Whether services formed part of the rent and tenancy obligations

Ratio Decidendi

The pursuers failed to establish entitlement to recover possession under Grounds 1(b), 11, and 12 as they did not genuinely require the property as their principal home, there were no arrears or persistent delay in paying rent, and the agreed rent was paid. Ground 17 did not apply as there was no contract of employment. Ground 13 could potentially apply as the provision of services formed part of the tenancy, but as the services were not specified in writing as required by section 21 of the Tenures Abolition Act 1746, the obligation could not be enforced for damages but could be considered for recovery of possession. The parties settled after the court ruled on this point, so no final...

Court Disposition

Action settled after ruling on legal issues; no order for recovery of possession made.