T. D. M'Neill & Son v. Innes, Chambers, & Co. [1917] ScotLR 513_1 (06 June 1917)
According to the law and practice of Scotland, due presentment of a bill of exchange for the purpose of summary diligence against the acceptor may be made on any day within six months of the bill falling due. The Bills of Exchange Act 1882 does not alter this practice, as expressly preserved by section 98. The respondents complied with all necessary steps, and summary diligence was therefore competent.
- Citation
- [1917] ScotLR 513_1
- Parties
- Complainers (reclaimers) / Acceptors: T. D. M'Neill & Son; Respondents / Drawers: Innes, Chambers, & Company
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 06 June 1917
- Procedural Posture
- Note of Suspension (summary Diligence on Bill of Exchange) / Inner House, First Division, Reclaiming Motion (appeal) Against Lord Ordinary's Refusal of Suspension
- Outcome
- Note of suspension refused; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary affirmed; expenses awarded against complainers.
- Legal Topics
- Bills of Exchange, Summary Diligence, Presentment for Payment, Protest of Bills, Scots Law Practice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
T. D. M'Neill & Son
Complainers (reclaimers) / Acceptors
Innes, Chambers, & Company
Respondents / Drawers
Procedural Posture
Note of Suspension (summary Diligence on Bill of Exchange) / Inner House, First Division, Reclaiming Motion (appeal) Against Lord Ordinary's Refusal of Suspension
Legal Issues
- 1 Is summary diligence competent against the acceptor of a bill of exchange when presentment for payment was not made on the due date but within six months thereafter?
- 2 Does the Bills of Exchange Act 1882 alter the Scots law and practice regarding summary diligence against acceptors?
Ratio Decidendi
According to the law and practice of Scotland, due presentment of a bill of exchange for the purpose of summary diligence against the acceptor may be made on any day within six months of the bill falling due. The Bills of Exchange Act 1882 does not alter this practice, as expressly preserved by section 98. The respondents complied with all necessary steps, and summary diligence was therefore competent.
Court Disposition
Note of suspension refused; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary affirmed; expenses awarded against complainers.
Orders
- Refusal of note of suspension.
- Affirmation of Lord Ordinary's interlocutor.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment