MacLean v Caledonian Macbrayne Ltd [1999] ScotCS 250 (28 October 1999)

MacLean v Caledonian Macbrayne Ltd [1999] ScotCS 250 (28 October 1999)

The court held that although the defenders breached their statutory duty and were negligent in failing to provide a gate, the pursuer's injury did not occur during the dangerous phase identified by the expert evidence. The accident occurred after the perilous stage had been completed, during a phase not considered dangerous. Therefore, the necessary causal connection between the breach and the injury was not established, and the defenders were not liable.

Citation
[1999] ScotCS 250
Parties
Pursuer and Reclaimer: John MacLean; Defenders and Respondents: Caledonian Macbrayne Limited
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
28 October 1999
Procedural Posture
Reclaiming Motion (appeal) / Inner House, Extra Division, Court of Session
Outcome
Reclaiming motion refused; absolvitor granted to defenders.
Legal Topics
Breach of Statutory Duty, Negligence, Causation, Workplace Safety
Personal Injury Employment Law Breach of Statutory Duty Negligence Causation Workplace Safety

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John MacLean

Pursuer and Reclaimer

Caledonian Macbrayne Limited

Defenders and Respondents

Procedural Posture

Reclaiming Motion (appeal) / Inner House, Extra Division, Court of Session

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defenders' failure to provide a gate in the railing was the cause of the pursuer's injury
  2. 2 Whether the breach of statutory duty and negligence by the defenders was causally connected to the accident

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that although the defenders breached their statutory duty and were negligent in failing to provide a gate, the pursuer's injury did not occur during the dangerous phase identified by the expert evidence. The accident occurred after the perilous stage had been completed, during a phase not considered dangerous. Therefore, the necessary causal connection between the breach and the injury was not established, and the defenders were not liable.

Court Disposition

Reclaiming motion refused; absolvitor granted to defenders.

Orders

  • The reclaiming motion is refused.
  • The Lord Ordinary's granting of absolvitor is upheld.