Gillespie Investments Ltd v Gillespie [2010] ScotCS CSOH_114 (13 August 2010)

Gillespie Investments Ltd v Gillespie [2010] ScotCS CSOH_114 (13 August 2010)

The court found that all shareholders and directors had actual knowledge of and consented to the use of company staff and reimbursement arrangements, except for a specific payment to Mr Alasdair Young. Therefore, no sum is due by the defender in relation to the payments to Strathbell, and only the payment to Mr Young is potentially recoverable.

Citation
[2010] ScotCS CSOH_114
Parties
Pursuer: Gillespie Investments Limited; Defender: John McLean Thomson Gillespie
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
13 August 2010
Procedural Posture
Civil Action for Damages for Breach of Fiduciary Duty / Post Proof Opinion, Further Submissions Invited
Outcome
Further submissions invited; no final order on liability or quantum at this stage.
Legal Topics
Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Directors' Duties, Consent and Knowledge of Shareholders, Apportionment of Loss, Relief Under Companies Act 2006 S.1157
Company Law Trusts and Fiduciary Law Breach of Fiduciary Duty Directors' Duties Consent and Knowledge of Shareholders Apportionment of Loss Relief Under Companies Act 2006 S.1157

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 9
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gillespie Investments Limited

Pursuer

John McLean Thomson Gillespie

Defender

Procedural Posture

Civil Action for Damages for Breach of Fiduciary Duty / Post Proof Opinion, Further Submissions Invited

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defender breached fiduciary duties as a director by authorising disputed payments
  2. 2 Whether shareholders consented to the disputed transactions
  3. 3 Whether any loss was suffered by the company as a result of the payments

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that all shareholders and directors had actual knowledge of and consented to the use of company staff and reimbursement arrangements, except for a specific payment to Mr Alasdair Young. Therefore, no sum is due by the defender in relation to the payments to Strathbell, and only the payment to Mr Young is potentially recoverable.

Court Disposition

Further submissions invited; no final order on liability or quantum at this stage.

Orders

  • Counsel to lodge written submissions within four weeks on specified issues, including apportionment and excess payment to shareholder.
  • Cases to be put out by order for a hearing on those submissions.