RICHARD SYRED AND ANOTHER AGAINST LADY CHRISTINE DE LA RUE AND ANOTHER [2020] ScotCS CSOH_65 (26 June 2020)
Specification in pursuers' pleadings is sufficient for delivery and damages claims; breach of clause 7.1 regarding water test certificate is admitted but waiver is fact-sensitive and cannot be resolved without proof; all issues require probation.
- Citation
- [2020] ScotCS CSOH_65
- Parties
- Pursuer: Richard Syred and another; Defender: Lady Christine De La Rue and another, as executors of the late David Ian Liddell-Grainger and others
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 26 June 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action (specific Implement, Damages, Declarator) / Preliminary Hearing on Relevancy and Specification; Interlocutor for Proof Before Answer
- Outcome
- Proof before answer ordered; all conclusions, averments and pleas-in-law standing; expenses reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Missives, Specific Implement, Waiver, Private Water Supply Compliance, Damages for Breach, Retention in Settlement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Richard Syred and another
Pursuer
Lady Christine De La Rue and another, as executors of the late David Ian Liddell-Grainger and others
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil Action (specific Implement, Damages, Declarator) / Preliminary Hearing on Relevancy and Specification; Interlocutor for Proof Before Answer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether pursuers' pleadings specify items for delivery with sufficient precision
- 2 Whether pursuers have pled breach of clause 7.1 regarding water supply quality and certificate
- 3 Whether pursuers waived defenders' obligation to exhibit water test certificate
Ratio Decidendi
Specification in pursuers' pleadings is sufficient for delivery and damages claims; breach of clause 7.1 regarding water test certificate is admitted but waiver is fact-sensitive and cannot be resolved without proof; all issues require probation.
Court Disposition
Proof before answer ordered; all conclusions, averments and pleas-in-law standing; expenses reserved.
Orders
- Diet of proof before answer appointed.
- All parties' averments and pleas-in-law to proceed to proof.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment