Brown v. Young [1900] ScotLR 37_466 (21 February 1900)
Where a proposed building provides the statutory minimum open space for lighting and ventilation, as required by section 170 of the Burgh Police (Scotland) Act 1892, the Dean of Guild has no discretion to refuse a lining on the basis of potential future developments on adjoining properties or the character of the locality. The statutory requirement is satisfied by compliance with the specified area, regardless of other considerations.
- Citation
- [1900] ScotLR 37_466
- Parties
- Petitioner/appellant: William Brown; Respondent/objector: Christopher Young, Master of Works, Coatbridge
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 21 February 1900
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Dean of Guild Court Decision / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal sustained; interlocutor of Dean of Guild recalled; case remitted to grant decree of lining except for south-east corner houses; petitioner awarded expenses of appeal.
- Legal Topics
- Building Regulations, Ventilation and Lighting Requirements, Statutory Interpretation, Local Authority Powers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
William Brown
Petitioner/appellant
Christopher Young, Master of Works, Coatbridge
Respondent/objector
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Dean of Guild Court Decision / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed buildings complied with section 170 of the Burgh Police (Scotland) Act 1892 regarding lighting and ventilation.
- 2 Whether the Dean of Guild was entitled to refuse a lining based on potential future changes to adjoining properties.
Ratio Decidendi
Where a proposed building provides the statutory minimum open space for lighting and ventilation, as required by section 170 of the Burgh Police (Scotland) Act 1892, the Dean of Guild has no discretion to refuse a lining on the basis of potential future developments on adjoining properties or the character of the locality. The statutory requirement is satisfied by compliance with the specified area, regardless of other considerations.
Court Disposition
Appeal sustained; interlocutor of Dean of Guild recalled; case remitted to grant decree of lining except for south-east corner houses; petitioner awarded expenses of appeal.
Orders
- Recall the interlocutor of the Dean of Guild of 5th October last.
- Remit to the Dean of Guild to grant decree of lining as craved except as regards the two houses forming the south-east corner of the subjects.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment