Liddall v. Ballingry Parish Council [1908] ScotLR 816 (04 July 1908)
The Sheriff-Substitute acted in a purely administrative capacity and had no statutory or common law power to award expenses against Mr Liddall; in the absence of special circumstances or vexatious conduct, objectors in such proceedings are not liable for expenses merely because their opposition was unsuccessful.
- Citation
- [1908] ScotLR 816
- Parties
- Complainer/respondent: W. J. N. Liddall of Navitie; Petitioner/reclaimer: Ballingry Parish Council
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 04 July 1908
- Procedural Posture
- Statutory Petition and Suspension / Reclaiming Note Against Interlocutor Suspending Charge for Expenses
- Outcome
- charge for expenses suspended; interlocutor adhered to
- Legal Topics
- Burial Grounds (scotland) Act 1855, Administrative Vs Judicial Capacity, Award of Expenses in Statutory Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
W. J. N. Liddall of Navitie
Complainer/respondent
Ballingry Parish Council
Petitioner/reclaimer
Procedural Posture
Statutory Petition and Suspension / Reclaiming Note Against Interlocutor Suspending Charge for Expenses
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Sheriff had power to award expenses against an objecting proprietor in a statutory administrative proceeding under the Burial Grounds (Scotland) Act 1855
- 2 Whether the proceedings before the Sheriff were administrative or judicial in nature
Ratio Decidendi
The Sheriff-Substitute acted in a purely administrative capacity and had no statutory or common law power to award expenses against Mr Liddall; in the absence of special circumstances or vexatious conduct, objectors in such proceedings are not liable for expenses merely because their opposition was unsuccessful.
Court Disposition
charge for expenses suspended; interlocutor adhered to
Orders
- Suspension of charge and whole grounds and warrants thereof simpliciter, with expenses
- Court adhered to Lord Ordinary's interlocutor
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment