Kinloss Parish Council v. Morgan and Others [1907] ScotLR 181 (22 November 1907)
The term 'poor' in the bequest must be given its ordinary meaning, covering all necessitous persons in the parish, not limited to those in receipt of parochial relief. The intention of the testator, as evidenced by his charitable conduct and the wording of the bequest, was to benefit all poor persons, not just the legal poor.
- Citation
- [1907] ScotLR 181
- Parties
- First Party: Kinloss Parish Council; Second Party: Rachel Morgan and others; Third Party: Margaret Masson and others
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 22 November 1907
- Procedural Posture
- Special Case Stated / Judgment
- Outcome
- The bequest is to be administered for the benefit of all necessitous persons in the parish, not limited to those in receipt of parochial relief.
- Legal Topics
- Charitable Bequest, Interpretation of 'poor' in Testamentary Dispositions, Administration of Charitable Funds, Poor Law Amendment (scotland) Act 1845
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kinloss Parish Council
First Party
Rachel Morgan and others
Second Party
Margaret Masson and others
Third Party
Procedural Posture
Special Case Stated / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a bequest to the Parish Council 'for the benefit of the poor of the parish' is limited to persons in receipt of parochial relief (the 'legal poor'), or extends to all necessitous persons regardless of receipt of relief.
Ratio Decidendi
The term 'poor' in the bequest must be given its ordinary meaning, covering all necessitous persons in the parish, not limited to those in receipt of parochial relief. The intention of the testator, as evidenced by his charitable conduct and the wording of the bequest, was to benefit all poor persons, not just the legal poor.
Court Disposition
The bequest is to be administered for the benefit of all necessitous persons in the parish, not limited to those in receipt of parochial relief.
Orders
- The first alternative of the legal question is answered in the negative; the second alternative is answered in the affirmative.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment