Chalmers' Trustees v. Turriff Parish School Board [1917] ScotLR 546 (13 July 1917)
A provision empowering trustees to apply a bequest to 'such other charitable purpose or educational scheme for the poor as they may deem fit and proper' is not void for uncertainty, as such educational schemes for the poor are charitable purposes under Scots law.
- Citation
- [1917] ScotLR 546
- Parties
- First Parties: James Taggart, Provost of Aberdeen, and others, Trustees under the deed of settlement granted by George, James, and Alexander Chalmers; Second Parties: School Board of the Parish of Turriff and others
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 13 July 1917
- Procedural Posture
- Special Case / Court of Session Inner House Second Division, Judgment
- Outcome
- Provision upheld as valid; not void for uncertainty.
- Legal Topics
- Charitable Bequests, Educational Trusts, Uncertainty in Trusts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Taggart, Provost of Aberdeen, and others, Trustees under the deed of settlement granted by George, James, and Alexander Chalmers
First Parties
School Board of the Parish of Turriff and others
Second Parties
Procedural Posture
Special Case / Court of Session Inner House Second Division, Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a provision for application of a bequest to 'such other charitable purpose or educational scheme for the poor as they may deem fit and proper' is void for uncertainty
Ratio Decidendi
A provision empowering trustees to apply a bequest to 'such other charitable purpose or educational scheme for the poor as they may deem fit and proper' is not void for uncertainty, as such educational schemes for the poor are charitable purposes under Scots law.
Court Disposition
Provision upheld as valid; not void for uncertainty.
Orders
- First question of law answered in the affirmative: trustees may apply the annuity to such other charitable purpose or educational scheme for the poor as they deem fit and proper.
- Third question answered in the negative: the provision is not void from uncertainty.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment