A.B. v. C.D. [2012] ScotSC 25 (22 February 2012)
It is in the best interests of the child, IL, that a Specific Issue Order be made permitting the Defender to relocate with IL to Canada. The Defender is the primary carer, has a proven track record as a parent, and will have significantly greater family and community support in Canada. The child's welfare is closely linked to the Defender's welfare, which is adversely affected by isolation and stress in Scotland. The relationship with the Pursuer, while important, is less significant than the primary bond with the mother and can be maintained through regular visits and electronic contact. The move is reasonable and motivated by the child's welfare, not self-interest.
- Citation
- [2012] ScotSC 25
- Parties
- Pursuer: AB; Defender: CD
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 22 February 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Specific Issue Order (child Relocation) / Judgment After Proof (trial)
- Outcome
- Specific Issue Order granted in favour of the Defender; Defender permitted to relocate with child to Canada; further hearing appointed on contact and expenses.
- Legal Topics
- Child Relocation, Specific Issue Order, Parental Rights and Responsibilities, Welfare of the Child, Contact Arrangements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AB
Pursuer
CD
Defender
Procedural Posture
Specific Issue Order (child Relocation) / Judgment After Proof (trial)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether it is in the best interests of the child (IL) to permit the Defender to relocate with the child to Canada
- 2 Whether a Specific Issue Order should be granted allowing permanent removal from Scotland
- 3 What contact arrangements are appropriate if relocation is permitted
Ratio Decidendi
It is in the best interests of the child, IL, that a Specific Issue Order be made permitting the Defender to relocate with IL to Canada. The Defender is the primary carer, has a proven track record as a parent, and will have significantly greater family and community support in Canada. The child's welfare is closely linked to the Defender's welfare, which is adversely affected by isolation and stress in Scotland. The relationship with the Pursuer, while important, is less significant than the primary bond with the mother and can be maintained through regular visits and electronic contact. The move is reasonable and motivated by the child's welfare, not self-interest.
Court Disposition
Specific Issue Order granted in favour of the Defender; Defender permitted to relocate with child to Canada; further hearing appointed on contact and expenses.
Orders
- Sustains the Defender's first and third pleas-in-law
- Repels the Pursuer's first and third pleas-in-law
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment