AB (AP) v CD [2000] ScotCS 175 (27 June 2000)
Given the fundamental disputes over jurisdiction, applicable law, and forum, and the need for clarity on these issues before a full inquiry, the defender's motion for a preliminary proof restricted to forum and jurisdiction was granted.
- Citation
- [2000] ScotCS 175
- Parties
- Pursuer: AB (AP); Defender: CD
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 27 June 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Child Residence/custody Dispute / Motion for Preliminary Proof Prior to Full Proof
- Outcome
- Defender's motion for preliminary proof granted.
- Legal Topics
- Child Residence, Custody, Forum Non Conveniens, International Child Removal, Jurisdiction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AB (AP)
Pursuer
CD
Defender
Procedural Posture
Family Law Child Residence/custody Dispute / Motion for Preliminary Proof Prior to Full Proof
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Scottish or Maltese courts have jurisdiction to determine the residence and custody of the child EF
- 2 Whether the removal of EF from Malta by the pursuer was wrongful or illegal under Maltese law
- 3 Whether a preliminary proof should be held restricted to forum and jurisdiction issues
Ratio Decidendi
Given the fundamental disputes over jurisdiction, applicable law, and forum, and the need for clarity on these issues before a full inquiry, the defender's motion for a preliminary proof restricted to forum and jurisdiction was granted.
Court Disposition
Defender's motion for preliminary proof granted.
Orders
- The proof fixed for 29 and 30 June 2000 is to be a preliminary proof restricted to the defender's first and second pleas-in-law (forum and jurisdiction issues).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment