RAB v. MIB [2005] ScotCS CSIH_60 (12 August 2005)
The sheriff's refusal to recall the sist was a proper exercise of discretion, as the English courts had jurisdiction over the child and were the appropriate forum for determining her welfare. No grounds were established for appellate interference with the sheriff's decision, and the subsequent English proceedings confirmed the appropriateness of the sist.
- Citation
- [2005] ScotCS CSIH_60
- Parties
- Pursuer and Appellant: RAB; Defender and Respondent: MIB
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 12 August 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appeal From Interlocutor of Sheriff Principal Refusing Recall of Sist in Child Residence/contact Proceedings
- Outcome
- Appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Child Residence, Contact Orders, Jurisdictional Conflict, Forum Non Conveniens, Discretion of the Court
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
RAB
Pursuer and Appellant
MIB
Defender and Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal From Interlocutor of Sheriff Principal Refusing Recall of Sist in Child Residence/contact Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sheriff's refusal to recall the sist should be reversed
- 2 Whether the Scottish court should exercise jurisdiction over child residence/contact matters when proceedings are ongoing in England
- 3 Whether there was a misdirection in the exercise of judicial discretion
Ratio Decidendi
The sheriff's refusal to recall the sist was a proper exercise of discretion, as the English courts had jurisdiction over the child and were the appropriate forum for determining her welfare. No grounds were established for appellate interference with the sheriff's decision, and the subsequent English proceedings confirmed the appropriateness of the sist.
Court Disposition
Appeal refused
Orders
- The appeal is refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment