Royal Bank Of Scotland Plc v. Carlyle [2010] ScotCS CSOH_108 (06 August 2010)
The Bank had given an unequivocal and unconditional commitment to advance the funding, and it was not open to the Bank to amend its pleadings to introduce conditions inconsistent with that finding.
- Citation
- [2010] ScotCS CSOH_108
- Parties
- Pursuer: Royal Bank of Scotland Plc; Defender: William Derek Carlyle
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 06 August 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Action / Post Trial, by Order Hearing on Amendment and Interlocutor
- Outcome
- Refusal of pursuers' Minute of Amendment; decree of declarator on liability granted in favour of defender; questions of causation and loss left open; pursuers marked a reclaiming motion.
- Legal Topics
- Collateral Warranty, Unilateral Promise, Bilateral Agreement, Amendment of Pleadings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Royal Bank of Scotland Plc
Pursuer
William Derek Carlyle
Defender
Procedural Posture
Commercial Action / Post Trial, by Order Hearing on Amendment and Interlocutor
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the pursuers (the Bank) could amend pleadings to introduce implied conditions to their funding commitment
- 2 Whether the Bank's commitment was conditional or unconditional
Ratio Decidendi
The Bank had given an unequivocal and unconditional commitment to advance the funding, and it was not open to the Bank to amend its pleadings to introduce conditions inconsistent with that finding.
Court Disposition
Refusal of pursuers' Minute of Amendment; decree of declarator on liability granted in favour of defender; questions of causation and loss left open; pursuers marked a reclaiming motion.
Orders
- Refusal of pursuers' Minute of Amendment
- Decree of declarator on liability in favour of defender
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment