Aitchison & Ors v South Ayrshire Council [2011] ScotCS CSIH_72 (18 November 2011)
A collective grievance submitted by a trade union that specifies, in writing (including by electronic means), the names of employees who have, or might or should have, an equal pay grievance, satisfies Regulation 9(1)(b) of the 2004 Regulations. The regulation does not require the union to restrict the list to only those with an actual grievance at the time of submission. The use of a CD to communicate the list of names constitutes compliance with the requirement that the names be specified 'in writing'.
- Citation
- [2011] ScotCS CSIH_72
- Parties
- Claimants and Respondents: Caroline Aitchison and Others; Respondents and Appellants: South Ayrshire Council
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 18 November 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Under Section 37(1) of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996 / Court of Session (inner House, Extra Division)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed (majority decision)
- Legal Topics
- Collective Grievance Procedure, Equal Pay, Statutory Grievance Requirements, Jurisdiction of Employment Tribunal, Specification of Claimants, Electronic Communication in Legal Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Caroline Aitchison and Others
Claimants and Respondents
South Ayrshire Council
Respondents and Appellants
Procedural Posture
Appeal Under Section 37(1) of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996 / Court of Session (inner House, Extra Division)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the submission of a collective grievance by a trade union via a CD containing a list of members' names satisfies the statutory requirements under Regulation 9(1)(b) of the Employment Act 2002 (Dispute Resolution) Regulations 2004
- 2 Whether the names specified must be only those with an actual grievance or may include those who might or should have a grievance
- 3 Whether electronic communication (CD) constitutes 'in writing' for statutory purposes
Ratio Decidendi
A collective grievance submitted by a trade union that specifies, in writing (including by electronic means), the names of employees who have, or might or should have, an equal pay grievance, satisfies Regulation 9(1)(b) of the 2004 Regulations. The regulation does not require the union to restrict the list to only those with an actual grievance at the time of submission. The use of a CD to communicate the list of names constitutes compliance with the requirement that the names be specified 'in writing'.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed (majority decision)
Orders
- Decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal overturned
- Appeals remitted to the Employment Tribunal to proceed as accords
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment