King (AP) v T Tunnock Ltd [2000] ScotCS 70 (16 March 2000)
Compensation under Regulation 17(6) is payable for the loss of the value of the agency at the date of termination, regardless of whether the principal continues to benefit from the agent's activities. The French approach, which values compensation as two years' gross commission, is persuasive and aligns with the Directive's harmonisation objective. The appellant is entitled to compensation assessed on this basis, in addition to payment in lieu of notice.
- Citation
- [2000] ScotCS 70
- Parties
- Pursuer and Appellant: Douglas King (A.P.); Defenders and Respondents: T. Tunnock Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 16 March 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Sheriff Court / Appeal Judgment by Extra Division, Inner House, Court of Session
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Commercial Agency, Compensation on Termination, Interpretation of EU Directives, Harmonisation of Law, Statutory Compensation Vs. Common Law Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Douglas King (A.P.)
Pursuer and Appellant
T. Tunnock Limited
Defenders and Respondents
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Sheriff Court / Appeal Judgment by Extra Division, Inner House, Court of Session
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant is entitled to compensation under Regulation 17(6) and (7) of the Commercial Agents (Council Directive) Regulations 1993 upon termination of agency
- 2 Proper construction of the compensation provisions in the Regulations and Directive 86/653/EEC
- 3 Whether compensation is to be assessed on the French model or by common law principles
Ratio Decidendi
Compensation under Regulation 17(6) is payable for the loss of the value of the agency at the date of termination, regardless of whether the principal continues to benefit from the agent's activities. The French approach, which values compensation as two years' gross commission, is persuasive and aligns with the Directive's harmonisation objective. The appellant is entitled to compensation assessed on this basis, in addition to payment in lieu of notice.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Sheriff's interlocutor altered to award the appellant an additional sum of £27,144 with interest at 8% per annum from 14 July 1994
- Respondents found liable to the pursuer for compensation in addition to payment in lieu of notice
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment