Scottish Power Energy Retail Ltd v. Taskforce Contracts Ltd [2008] ScotCS CSOH_110 (05 August 2008)
The right to indemnity or compensation under Regulation 17 arises only upon termination of the entire agency contract or relationship, not upon partial termination or cessation of a separable element of the contract. The defenders' appointment as agent was not terminated by the cessation of Sainsbury's activities; the contract and agency relationship continued in respect of other activities. Therefore, no right to indemnity or compensation arose under Regulation 17 or Clause 3.8.1.
- Citation
- [2008] ScotCS CSOH_110
- Parties
- Pursuer: Scottish Power Energy Retail Limited; Defender: Taskforce Contracts Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 05 August 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Contract Dispute / Opinion Following Debate on Legal Issues (pleas in Law)
- Outcome
- Defenders not entitled to indemnity or compensation under Regulation 17 or Clause 3.8.1 on partial termination; case to be put out By Order for further procedure.
- Legal Topics
- Commercial Agency, Indemnity and Compensation on Termination, Interpretation of EU Directives, Partial Termination of Contract, Principal Agent Relationship
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Scottish Power Energy Retail Limited
Pursuer
Taskforce Contracts Limited
Defender
Procedural Posture
Commercial Contract Dispute / Opinion Following Debate on Legal Issues (pleas in Law)
Legal Issues
- 1 Does Regulation 17 of the Commercial Agents (Council Directive) Regulations 1993 entitle a commercial agent to indemnity or compensation upon partial termination of an agency contract?
- 2 Does the termination of a separable element of an agency contract (here, in-store activities) constitute 'termination' for the purposes of Regulation 17 and Clause 3.8.1 of the contract?
Ratio Decidendi
The right to indemnity or compensation under Regulation 17 arises only upon termination of the entire agency contract or relationship, not upon partial termination or cessation of a separable element of the contract. The defenders' appointment as agent was not terminated by the cessation of Sainsbury's activities; the contract and agency relationship continued in respect of other activities. Therefore, no right to indemnity or compensation arose under Regulation 17 or Clause 3.8.1.
Court Disposition
Defenders not entitled to indemnity or compensation under Regulation 17 or Clause 3.8.1 on partial termination; case to be put out By Order for further procedure.
Orders
- Case to be put out By Order to discuss detailed consequences following this Opinion.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment