@SIPP (Pension Trustees) Ltd v Insight Travel Services Ltd [2015] ScotCS CSIH_91 (11 December 2015)
The lease, properly construed, imposes on the tenant an obligation to put and keep the premises in good and substantial repair, not merely to maintain them in their condition at entry. Clause 7 entitles the landlord, upon notice, to payment of the cost of repairs required to bring the premises up to that standard, irrespective of the landlord’s intention to carry out the works or the effect on capital value. The Lord Ordinary erred in construing the lease otherwise.
- Citation
- [2015] ScotCS CSIH_91
- Parties
- Pursuer and Reclaimer: @SIPP Pension Trustees Ltd; Defender and Respondent: Insight Travel Services Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 11 December 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Reclaiming Motion (appeal) in Commercial Lease Dispute / Appeal Judgment (inner House, Extra Division, Court of Session)
- Outcome
- Reclaiming motion allowed; Lord Ordinary’s interlocutor reversed.
- Legal Topics
- Commercial Leases, Repairing Obligations, Measure of Damages, Contractual Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
@SIPP Pension Trustees Ltd
Pursuer and Reclaimer
Insight Travel Services Ltd
Defender and Respondent
Procedural Posture
Reclaiming Motion (appeal) in Commercial Lease Dispute / Appeal Judgment (inner House, Extra Division, Court of Session)
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the proper construction of the tenant’s repairing obligations under clause 3(a) of the lease?
- 2 Does clause 7 entitle the landlord to payment of the cost of repairs irrespective of diminution in capital value or intention to repair?
Ratio Decidendi
The lease, properly construed, imposes on the tenant an obligation to put and keep the premises in good and substantial repair, not merely to maintain them in their condition at entry. Clause 7 entitles the landlord, upon notice, to payment of the cost of repairs required to bring the premises up to that standard, irrespective of the landlord’s intention to carry out the works or the effect on capital value. The Lord Ordinary erred in construing the lease otherwise.
Court Disposition
Reclaiming motion allowed; Lord Ordinary’s interlocutor reversed.
Orders
- Reinstatement of the words 'put and' in article 10 of Condescendence.
- Exclusion from probation of specified averments in answers 11 and 13.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment