Thomas Dagg & Son Ltd & Anor v Dickensian Property Co Ltd [2005] ScotSC 7 (20 January 2005)
The defenders are liable for their share of the cost of necessary repairs to common property as the works were necessary, the pursuers had title and interest to sue, agency issues did not absolve liability, and the amendment to separate claims was properly allowed; the appeal is refused.
- Citation
- [2005] ScotSC 7
- Parties
- Pursuer: Thomas Dagg & Sons Limited; Pursuer: Taycove Ltd; Defender: Dickensian Property Co Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 20 January 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal refused; interlocutors adhered to.
- Legal Topics
- Common Property Repairs, Agency, Title to Sue, Company Law—authority, Amendment of Pleadings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Thomas Dagg & Sons Limited
Pursuer
Taycove Ltd
Pursuer
Dickensian Property Co Ltd
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defenders are liable for a share of costs for necessary repairs to common property
- 2 Whether the action was raised and pursued without authority
- 3 Whether the works constituted necessary repairs or improvements
Ratio Decidendi
The defenders are liable for their share of the cost of necessary repairs to common property as the works were necessary, the pursuers had title and interest to sue, agency issues did not absolve liability, and the amendment to separate claims was properly allowed; the appeal is refused.
Court Disposition
Appeal refused; interlocutors adhered to.
Orders
- Defenders and appellants found liable to the pursuers and respondents in the expenses occasioned by the appeal.
- Remit to the auditor of court to tax the account of expenses and report.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment