The Trustees and Managers of the Prime Gilt Box Society Petitioners [1920] ScotLR 463 (14 May 1920)
Where two craves are so intertwined that separate petitions would be unreasonably inconvenient, it is competent for the Inner House to dispose of both under its nobile officium and statutory jurisdiction.
- Citation
- [1920] ScotLR 463
- Parties
- Petitioner: The Trustees and Managers of the Prime Gilt Box Society; Agent for Petitioners: Daniel Tudhope
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 14 May 1920
- Procedural Posture
- Petition / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Petition granted
- Legal Topics
- Competency of Combined Petitions, Exercise of Nobile Officium, Trusts (scotland) Act 1867, Sale of Trust Property, Application of Charitable Funds Cy Pres
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 10
Parties
The Trustees and Managers of the Prime Gilt Box Society
Petitioner
Daniel Tudhope
Agent for Petitioners
Procedural Posture
Petition / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Is it competent to combine interdependent craves for sale of heritage and cy pres application of charitable funds in a single petition to the Inner House?
- 2 Should the Court grant authority to sell trust property and apply the income of a bequest fund to general purposes?
Ratio Decidendi
Where two craves are so intertwined that separate petitions would be unreasonably inconvenient, it is competent for the Inner House to dispose of both under its nobile officium and statutory jurisdiction.
Court Disposition
Petition granted
Orders
- Authority granted to sell heritable property at 415–417 High Street, Kirkcaldy for £1150 to Scottish Coast Mission
- Authority granted to sell pews in Kirkcaldy Parish Church for £30 to Kirk session
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment