STEWART MILNE GROUP LIMITED v. ALLAN WILLIAM CRUICKSHANK AND CATRIONA JANE CRUICKSHANK [2009] ScotSC 113 (26 May 2009)
The decisive factor is the nature of the transaction or dispute, not the status of the parties. The sale of property by a commercial developer to a purchaser, even if the purchaser is not in business, is a transaction of a commercial or business nature when the property is purchased as an investment. Therefore, the action was competently raised as a commercial action under Chapter 40.
- Citation
- [2009] ScotSC 113
- Parties
- Pursuer: Stewart Milne Group Limited; Defender: Allan William Cruickshank; Defender: Catriona Jane Cruickshank
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 26 May 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Action / Decision on Preliminary Plea to Competency
- Outcome
- Defender's first plea-in-law repelled; pursuer entitled to expenses of the debate.
- Legal Topics
- Competency of Commercial Actions, Definition of Commercial or Business Nature, Consumer Contracts Vs Commercial Actions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stewart Milne Group Limited
Pursuer
Allan William Cruickshank
Defender
Catriona Jane Cruickshank
Defender
Procedural Posture
Commercial Action / Decision on Preliminary Plea to Competency
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the action arises out of or is concerned with a transaction or dispute of a commercial or business nature within the meaning of Chapter 40 of the Ordinary Cause Rules
- 2 Whether a dispute between a commercial entity and a lay purchaser can competently be raised as a commercial action
Ratio Decidendi
The decisive factor is the nature of the transaction or dispute, not the status of the parties. The sale of property by a commercial developer to a purchaser, even if the purchaser is not in business, is a transaction of a commercial or business nature when the property is purchased as an investment. Therefore, the action was competently raised as a commercial action under Chapter 40.
Court Disposition
Defender's first plea-in-law repelled; pursuer entitled to expenses of the debate.
Orders
- Defender's first plea-in-law repelled
- Defender found liable to pursuer in expenses of the diet of debate
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment