STEWART MILNE GROUP LIMITED v. DUNCAN HAMISH EDWARD KERR [2009] ScotSC 112 (26 May 2009)
The phrase 'any transaction or dispute of a commercial or business nature' in the commercial cause rules is sufficiently broad to include claims by a business against a customer arising from the business's commercial activities, regardless of whether the customer is a lay purchaser or consumer. The nature of the transaction, not the status of the parties, is determinative. The defender's preliminary plea to competency is therefore repelled.
- Citation
- [2009] ScotSC 112
- Parties
- Pursuer: Stewart Milne Group Limited; Defender: Duncan Hamish Edward Kerr
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 26 May 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Action (sheriff Court) / Decision on Preliminary Plea to Competency
- Outcome
- Defender's preliminary plea repelled; pursuer entitled to expenses of the debate.
- Legal Topics
- Competency of Commercial Actions, Interpretation of Commercial Cause Rules, Consumer Versus Commercial Contracts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stewart Milne Group Limited
Pursuer
Duncan Hamish Edward Kerr
Defender
Procedural Posture
Commercial Action (sheriff Court) / Decision on Preliminary Plea to Competency
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the action arises out of or is concerned with a transaction or dispute of a commercial or business nature under Chapter 40 of the Ordinary Cause Rules
- 2 Whether a dispute between a commercial entity and a lay purchaser can competently be raised as a commercial action
Ratio Decidendi
The phrase 'any transaction or dispute of a commercial or business nature' in the commercial cause rules is sufficiently broad to include claims by a business against a customer arising from the business's commercial activities, regardless of whether the customer is a lay purchaser or consumer. The nature of the transaction, not the status of the parties, is determinative. The defender's preliminary plea to competency is therefore repelled.
Court Disposition
Defender's preliminary plea repelled; pursuer entitled to expenses of the debate.
Orders
- Repels the defender's first plea-in-law.
- Finds the defender liable to the pursuers in the expenses of the diet of debate.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment