Woodard's Judicial Factor v. Woodard [1919] ScotLR 214 (25 January 1919)
The will did not manifest a clear intention to include the heritable estate (the house) in the term 'remainder.' The context and language of the will indicated the testator was dealing only with moveable property, specifically cash and investments, not the family home. Therefore, the house did not pass under the will and devolved to the heir.
- Citation
- [1919] ScotLR 214
- Parties
- First Party (applicant): Robert Cockburn Millar, C. A., judicial factor on the estate of the deceased Charles John Woodard; Second Party (respondent): Frank Robert Woodard, only child of Charles John Woodard
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 25 January 1919
- Procedural Posture
- Special Case (succession/construction of Will) / Court of Session Inner House, First Division Judgment
- Outcome
- The first question (whether the will carried the house) answered in the negative; the second question (whether the house devolved to the heir) answered in the affirmative.
- Legal Topics
- Construction of Wills, Heritable Vs Moveable Estate, Titles to Land Consolidation (scotland) Act 1868, Sec. 20
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert Cockburn Millar, C. A., judicial factor on the estate of the deceased Charles John Woodard
First Party (applicant)
Frank Robert Woodard, only child of Charles John Woodard
Second Party (respondent)
Procedural Posture
Special Case (succession/construction of Will) / Court of Session Inner House, First Division Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the testator's will carried his heritable estate (the house) or only moveable estate
- 2 Whether the judicial factor was entitled to hold the house for the purposes of the will or it devolved to the heir
Ratio Decidendi
The will did not manifest a clear intention to include the heritable estate (the house) in the term 'remainder.' The context and language of the will indicated the testator was dealing only with moveable property, specifically cash and investments, not the family home. Therefore, the house did not pass under the will and devolved to the heir.
Court Disposition
The first question (whether the will carried the house) answered in the negative; the second question (whether the house devolved to the heir) answered in the affirmative.
Orders
- The house at 89 Willowbrae Avenue, Edinburgh, did not pass under the will and devolved to Frank Robert Woodard as heir.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment