Scottish Coal Company Ltd v. Kier Construction Ltd (t/a Kier Mining) [2005] ScotCS CSOH_74 (10 June 2005)
The defenders were contractually obliged to extract all coal from the site unless instructed otherwise by the site manager. The liquidated damages clauses do not apply to the defenders' failure to complete extraction of all coal, and thus do not preclude the pursuers from seeking common law damages for that breach. The pursuers' averments of loss are relevant and sufficiently pled for proof.
- Citation
- [2005] ScotCS CSOH_74
- Parties
- Pursuer: Scottish Coal Company Limited; Defender: Kier Construction Limited t/a Kier Mining
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 10 June 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (contractual Dispute) / Procedure Roll (plea to Relevancy)
- Outcome
- Defenders' first and second pleas in law repelled; proof before answer allowed.
- Legal Topics
- Construction of Contract, Liquidated Damages, Obligations of Contractor, Damages for Breach of Contract, Mitigation of Loss
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Scottish Coal Company Limited
Pursuer
Kier Construction Limited t/a Kier Mining
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil (contractual Dispute) / Procedure Roll (plea to Relevancy)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defenders' primary obligation was to extract all coal or only the minimum specified in the delivery schedule
- 2 Whether the pursuers are limited to liquidated damages or can claim common law damages for failure to extract all coal
- 3 Whether the pursuers' averments of loss are relevant given alleged failure to account for retained coal and fixed costs
Ratio Decidendi
The defenders were contractually obliged to extract all coal from the site unless instructed otherwise by the site manager. The liquidated damages clauses do not apply to the defenders' failure to complete extraction of all coal, and thus do not preclude the pursuers from seeking common law damages for that breach. The pursuers' averments of loss are relevant and sufficiently pled for proof.
Court Disposition
Defenders' first and second pleas in law repelled; proof before answer allowed.
Orders
- Proof before answer allowed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment