Curle's Trustees v. Millar and Others [1920] ScotLR 574 (28 May 1920)
The survivorship clause in the trust-disposition and settlement applies literally to the circumstances, entitling the surviving child and her issue to the accreting share. The destination-over clause is confined to the event of children and their issue predeceasing the testator and does not override the express terms of the survivorship clause. There is no ambiguity or clear evidence of contrary intention to justify construing 'survivors' as 'others' or including issue of predeceasing children in the accreting share.
- Citation
- [1920] ScotLR 574
- Parties
- Pursuer: Curle's Trustees; Claimant: Mrs Isabella Curle or Millar; Claimant: Mrs Jane Curle or Lamont's children; Deceased Beneficiary: Robert Barclay Curle
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 28 May 1920
- Procedural Posture
- Multiplepoinding / Inner House, First Division, Court of Session, Appeal Against Lord Ordinary's Interlocutor
- Outcome
- Interlocutor of Lord Ordinary recalled; trustees ranked and preferred in terms of Mrs Millar's claim.
- Legal Topics
- Construction of Testamentary Dispositions, Accretion, Interpretation of 'survivors', Destination Over Clauses
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Curle's Trustees
Pursuer
Mrs Isabella Curle or Millar
Claimant
Mrs Jane Curle or Lamont's children
Claimant
Robert Barclay Curle
Deceased Beneficiary
Procedural Posture
Multiplepoinding / Inner House, First Division, Court of Session, Appeal Against Lord Ordinary's Interlocutor
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the issue of a predeceasing child are entitled to accreting shares under a survivorship clause in a trust-disposition and settlement
- 2 Whether the destination-over clause applies to the survivorship clause or only to the clause dealing with children predeceasing the testator
Ratio Decidendi
The survivorship clause in the trust-disposition and settlement applies literally to the circumstances, entitling the surviving child and her issue to the accreting share. The destination-over clause is confined to the event of children and their issue predeceasing the testator and does not override the express terms of the survivorship clause. There is no ambiguity or clear evidence of contrary intention to justify construing 'survivors' as 'others' or including issue of predeceasing children in the accreting share.
Court Disposition
Interlocutor of Lord Ordinary recalled; trustees ranked and preferred in terms of Mrs Millar's claim.
Orders
- Trustees to hold and retain the accreting share for Mrs Millar in liferent and her issue in fee.
- Claim of Mrs Lamont's children to the accreting share rejected.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment