Crowe v. Cook (Hall Maxwell's Executor) [1908] ScotLR 904 (17 July 1908)
The testamentary writing, though informal and ungrammatical, when read as a whole, evidenced an intention by the testatrix to dispose of her entire estate, both heritable and moveable, by the use of the phrases 'everything else to be sold' and 'I leave the remainder.' These words, in context, were sufficient to carry the heritable estate under section 20 of the Titles to Land (Scotland) Act 1868.
- Citation
- [1908] ScotLR 904
- Parties
- Pursuer (respondent): James F. Crowe; Defender (reclaimer): James Cook (Hall Maxwell's Executor)
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 17 July 1908
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Dispute (declarator) / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) in the Inner House, First Division
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; Lord Ordinary's interlocutor recalled; defender assoilzied (absolved).
- Legal Topics
- Construction of Wills, Bequest of Heritage, Testamentary Intention, Titles to Land (scotland) Act 1868, Section 20
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James F. Crowe
Pursuer (respondent)
James Cook (Hall Maxwell's Executor)
Defender (reclaimer)
Procedural Posture
Succession Dispute (declarator) / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) in the Inner House, First Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the testamentary writing of Mrs Hall Maxwell carried heritable estate as well as moveable estate
- 2 Whether the words used in the will were sufficient to dispose of the heritable estate under section 20 of the Titles to Land (Scotland) Act 1868
Ratio Decidendi
The testamentary writing, though informal and ungrammatical, when read as a whole, evidenced an intention by the testatrix to dispose of her entire estate, both heritable and moveable, by the use of the phrases 'everything else to be sold' and 'I leave the remainder.' These words, in context, were sufficient to carry the heritable estate under section 20 of the Titles to Land (Scotland) Act 1868.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; Lord Ordinary's interlocutor recalled; defender assoilzied (absolved).
Orders
- The Lord Ordinary's decree as craved is recalled.
- The defender is assoilzied (absolved) from the conclusions of the summons.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment