E.B. v. F.R. [2009] ScotSC 152 (30 September 2009)

E.B. v. F.R. [2009] ScotSC 152 (30 September 2009)

The court found beyond reasonable doubt that the father wilfully, intentionally, and flagrantly breached court orders by failing to return the child on three occasions, made no genuine effort to secure compliance, and deliberately misled the court through false pleadings, amounting to contempt of court.

Citation
[2009] ScotSC 152
Parties
Pursuer/father: E. B.; Defender/mother: F. R.; Curator Ad Litem to the Child: Mr Barr
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
30 September 2009
Procedural Posture
Minute for Contempt of Court in Family Proceedings (contact/residence) / Post Proof Hearing, Judgment on Contempt
Outcome
Father found in contempt of court for wilful breach of contact orders and abuse of process.
Legal Topics
Contempt of Court, Child Contact Orders, Parental Responsibilities, Abuse of Process

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

E. B.

Pursuer/father

F. R.

Defender/mother

Mr Barr

Curator Ad Litem to the Child

Procedural Posture

Minute for Contempt of Court in Family Proceedings (contact/residence) / Post Proof Hearing, Judgment on Contempt

  1. 1 Whether the father wilfully and intentionally failed to comply with court orders regarding the return of the child.
  2. 2 Whether the father committed contempt of court by lodging knowingly false pleadings (abuse of process).

Ratio Decidendi

The court found beyond reasonable doubt that the father wilfully, intentionally, and flagrantly breached court orders by failing to return the child on three occasions, made no genuine effort to secure compliance, and deliberately misled the court through false pleadings, amounting to contempt of court.

Court Disposition

Father found in contempt of court for wilful breach of contact orders and abuse of process.

Orders

  • Father found in contempt of court for three failures to return the child as ordered and for abuse of process by lodging false pleadings.
  • Contact order suspended ad interim; father interdicted from contact with the child pending further hearing.