Great Stuart Trustees Ltd v McDonald, Public Guardian [2014] ScotCS CSIH_114 (24 December 2014)
The power of attorney in question is valid as a continuing power of attorney under section 15 of the Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000 because the document, construed objectively, clearly expresses the granter’s intention to create such a power, and satisfies the statutory requirements. Section 15(3)(ba) does not apply as the power is immediately exercisable.
- Citation
- [2014] ScotCS CSIH_114
- Parties
- First Party: Great Stuart Trustees Limited; Second Party: Sandra McDonald, Public Guardian
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 24 December 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Special Case / Opinion of the Court
- Outcome
- Power of attorney held valid as a continuing power of attorney under section 15 of the 2000 Act.
- Legal Topics
- Continuing Power of Attorney, Adults With Incapacity (scotland) Act 2000, Interpretation of Statutory Requirements for Powers of Attorney
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Great Stuart Trustees Limited
First Party
Sandra McDonald, Public Guardian
Second Party
Procedural Posture
Special Case / Opinion of the Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the power of attorney granted by Mr JS is valid as a continuing power of attorney under section 15 of the Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000
- 2 Whether the document satisfies the requirements of section 15(3)(b) and (ba) of the 2000 Act
Ratio Decidendi
The power of attorney in question is valid as a continuing power of attorney under section 15 of the Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000 because the document, construed objectively, clearly expresses the granter’s intention to create such a power, and satisfies the statutory requirements. Section 15(3)(ba) does not apply as the power is immediately exercisable.
Court Disposition
Power of attorney held valid as a continuing power of attorney under section 15 of the 2000 Act.
Orders
- First question (validity under s.15(3)(b)) answered in the affirmative.
- Second question (validity under s.15(3)(ba)) answered in the affirmative.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment