SUPASEAL GLASS LTD AGAINST INVERCLYDE WINDOWS MANUFACTURING LTD [2022] ScotCS CSOH_49 (20 July 2022)
A binding and enforceable contract was concluded on 8 December 2015 between Supaseal and Inverclyde for the exclusive supply of glass until 31 December 2020 at agreed prices, as all essential terms were settled and there was no requirement for a written agreement; the parties' conduct and contemporaneous documentation evidenced immediate intention to be bound.
- Citation
- [2022] ScotCS CSOH_49
- Parties
- Pursuer: Supaseal Glass Limited; Defender: Inverclyde Windows Manufacturing Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 20 July 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Contract Dispute / Preliminary Proof on Contract Formation and Terms
- Outcome
- For the pursuer; defender's first to fourth pleas in law repelled; case put out by order for further procedure.
- Legal Topics
- Contract Formation, Exclusivity Agreements, Requirements of Writing, Certainty of Terms, Objective Assessment of Intention
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Supaseal Glass Limited
Pursuer
Inverclyde Windows Manufacturing Limited
Defender
Procedural Posture
Commercial Contract Dispute / Preliminary Proof on Contract Formation and Terms
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a binding and enforceable contract was concluded between the parties on 8 December 2015
- 2 Whether the contract required to be in writing to be enforceable
- 3 What the terms of the contract were and whether they were sufficiently certain
Ratio Decidendi
A binding and enforceable contract was concluded on 8 December 2015 between Supaseal and Inverclyde for the exclusive supply of glass until 31 December 2020 at agreed prices, as all essential terms were settled and there was no requirement for a written agreement; the parties' conduct and contemporaneous documentation evidenced immediate intention to be bound.
Court Disposition
For the pursuer; defender's first to fourth pleas in law repelled; case put out by order for further procedure.
Orders
- Repel defender's first to fourth pleas in law
- Put case out by order to discuss further procedure
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment