RECLAIMING MOTION BY CRIMOND ESTATES LTD AGAINST MILE END DEVELOPMENTS LTD [2021] ScotCS CSIH_60 (29 October 2021)
Clause 3.12 applies to termination by the defender under clause 6.2.7, regardless of whether the termination was lawful or in breach of contract. Reasonable remuneration under clause 3.12 is to be based on the open market rate for similar project management services and does not require assessment of the quality of services provided. The conditions in clause 3.9 do not limit the entitlement to reasonable remuneration under clause 3.12 in the circumstances of this case.
- Citation
- [2021] ScotCS CSIH_60
- Parties
- Pursuer and Respondent: Crimond Estates Limited; Defender and Reclaimer: Mile End Developments Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 29 October 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Reclaiming Motion (appeal) / Inner House, Court of Session, Post Proof Judgment
- Outcome
- Reclaiming motion refused
- Legal Topics
- Contract Interpretation, Termination of Contract, Remuneration for Services, Damages for Breach of Contract
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Crimond Estates Limited
Pursuer and Respondent
Mile End Developments Limited
Defender and Reclaimer
Procedural Posture
Reclaiming Motion (appeal) / Inner House, Court of Session, Post Proof Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether clause 3.12 of the contract applies where termination was in breach of contract
- 2 Whether reasonable remuneration under clause 3.12 requires assessment of quality of services
- 3 Whether payment under clause 3.12 is subject to the conditions in clause 3.9
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 3.12 applies to termination by the defender under clause 6.2.7, regardless of whether the termination was lawful or in breach of contract. Reasonable remuneration under clause 3.12 is to be based on the open market rate for similar project management services and does not require assessment of the quality of services provided. The conditions in clause 3.9 do not limit the entitlement to reasonable remuneration under clause 3.12 in the circumstances of this case.
Court Disposition
Reclaiming motion refused
Orders
- Award of £211,831.63 to the pursuer for reasonable remuneration under clause 3.12 is upheld
- All questions as to expenses reserved
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment