Shetland Times Ltd. v Dr Jonathan Wills [1996] ScotCS CSOH_6 (24 October 1996)
The pursuers established a prima facie case that the defenders' reproduction of headlines and provision of direct links to the pursuers' news items constituted an infringement of copyright under sections 17 and 20 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. The headlines may be protected as literary works, and the Internet service may constitute a cable programme service. The balance of convenience favoured granting interim interdict to prevent potential loss of advertising revenue.
- Citation
- [1996] ScotCS CSOH_6
- Parties
- Pursuer: Shetland Times Ltd; First Defender: Dr Jonathan Wills; Second Defender: The Shetland News (company)
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 24 October 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Interim Interdict (injunction) Application / Motion for Interim Interdict Before Lord Ordinary
- Outcome
- Interim interdict granted
- Legal Topics
- Copyright Infringement, Internet Publication, Cable Programme Service, Literary Works, Interim Interdict
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shetland Times Ltd
Pursuer
Dr Jonathan Wills
First Defender
The Shetland News (company)
Second Defender
Procedural Posture
Interim Interdict (injunction) Application / Motion for Interim Interdict Before Lord Ordinary
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the reproduction of headlines from the pursuer's website by the defenders constitutes copyright infringement under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 sections 17 and 20
- 2 Whether the headlines are protected as literary works under the Act
- 3 Whether the defenders' website constitutes a cable programme service under section 7 of the Act
Ratio Decidendi
The pursuers established a prima facie case that the defenders' reproduction of headlines and provision of direct links to the pursuers' news items constituted an infringement of copyright under sections 17 and 20 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. The headlines may be protected as literary works, and the Internet service may constitute a cable programme service. The balance of convenience favoured granting interim interdict to prevent potential loss of advertising revenue.
Court Disposition
Interim interdict granted
Orders
- Interim interdict granted in terms of the amended second conclusion, restraining the defenders from reproducing the pursuers' headlines and providing direct links to the pursuers' news items.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment