Clark Taylor v Quality Site Development (Edinburgh) Ltd [1981] ScotCS CSIH_1 (08 January 1981)

Clark Taylor v Quality Site Development (Edinburgh) Ltd [1981] ScotCS CSIH_1 (08 January 1981)

Condition 11(b) of the contract did not constitute a valid trust under Scottish law, as it imposed only a contractual obligation and lacked the essential elements of a trust, including divestiture and beneficial interest. Mere acceptance of an obligation to hold assets in trust is not equivalent to delivery or creation of a trust where truster and trustee are the same person.

Citation
[1981] ScotCS CSIH_1
Parties
Seller: Clark Taylor & Co. Ltd.; Buyer: Quality Site Development (Edinburgh) Ltd.
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
08 January 1981
Procedural Posture
Special Case / Court of Session, Inner House, Opinion Delivered
Outcome
Applicant's claim rejected; questions answered in the negative.
Legal Topics
Creation of Trusts, Trusts in Insolvency, Retention of Title Clauses, Divestiture Requirements
Property Law Trusts Law Bankruptcy Law Creation of Trusts Trusts in Insolvency Retention of Title Clauses Divestiture Requirements

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Clark Taylor & Co. Ltd.

Seller

Quality Site Development (Edinburgh) Ltd.

Buyer

Procedural Posture

Special Case / Court of Session, Inner House, Opinion Delivered

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a contractual obligation to hold assets in trust constitutes a valid trust under Scottish law
  2. 2 Whether the buyer was obliged to hold interim payments in trust for the seller
  3. 3 Whether the buyer held such sums under the administration of the liquidator in trust for the seller

Ratio Decidendi

Condition 11(b) of the contract did not constitute a valid trust under Scottish law, as it imposed only a contractual obligation and lacked the essential elements of a trust, including divestiture and beneficial interest. Mere acceptance of an obligation to hold assets in trust is not equivalent to delivery or creation of a trust where truster and trustee are the same person.

Court Disposition

Applicant's claim rejected; questions answered in the negative.

Orders

  • Questions 1 and 2 answered in the negative.
  • Remainder superseded as unnecessary.