Johnston v WH Brown Construction (Dundee) Ltd [1999] ScotCS 145 (11 June 1999)
Costs incurred by the employer in investigating, preparing, and delivering a Schedule of Defects under Condition 16.2, including technical and legal advice and management time, are not recoverable as damages against the contractor in the ordinary operation of the contract. The pursuer's claims for disruption and management costs are inadequately specified and do not constitute a relevant head of damages.
- Citation
- [1999] ScotCS 145
- Parties
- Pursuer: Michael A Johnston; Defenders: W H Brown Construction (Dundee) Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 11 June 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Ordinary Action (commercial Roll) / Judgment After Debate on Relevancy and Specification
- Outcome
- Principal action dismissed; decree granted for defenders on counterclaim.
- Legal Topics
- Damages for Breach of Contract, Defects Liability Period, Recoverability of Investigation and Management Costs, Building Contracts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael A Johnston
Pursuer
W H Brown Construction (Dundee) Limited
Defenders
Procedural Posture
Ordinary Action (commercial Roll) / Judgment After Debate on Relevancy and Specification
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether costs incurred by the employer for technical investigation, legal advice, and management time in preparing a Schedule of Defects are recoverable as damages for breach of contract under a building contract with contractor's design.
- 2 Whether the pursuer's claim for disruption and management costs is sufficiently specified to justify inquiry.
Ratio Decidendi
Costs incurred by the employer in investigating, preparing, and delivering a Schedule of Defects under Condition 16.2, including technical and legal advice and management time, are not recoverable as damages against the contractor in the ordinary operation of the contract. The pursuer's claims for disruption and management costs are inadequately specified and do not constitute a relevant head of damages.
Court Disposition
Principal action dismissed; decree granted for defenders on counterclaim.
Orders
- Sustain defenders' first plea-in-law and dismiss the principal action.
- Sustain defenders' plea-in-law in the counterclaim and grant decree as counterclaimed for.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment