Mack v. Glasgow City Council [2006] ScotCS CSIH_18 (30 March 2006)
A claim for damages for inconvenience arising from breach of contract does not constitute a claim for personal injuries under section 17 of the Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973. Inconvenience is a recoverable head of general damages for breach of contract, regardless of whether the pursuer is a natural person or a body corporate, and is not to be conflated with personal injury.
- Citation
- [2006] ScotCS CSIH_18
- Parties
- Pursuer and Respondent: Angela Mack; Defenders and Appellants: Glasgow City Council
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 30 March 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff Principal's Interlocutor to Inner House, Court of Session
- Outcome
- Appeal refused; interlocutor of the sheriff principal adhered to.
- Legal Topics
- Damages for Inconvenience, Limitation of Actions, Personal Injuries Definition, Breach of Contract
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Angela Mack
Pursuer and Respondent
Glasgow City Council
Defenders and Appellants
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff Principal's Interlocutor to Inner House, Court of Session
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a claim for damages for inconvenience arising from breach of contract constitutes a claim for 'personal injuries' under section 17 of the Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973
Ratio Decidendi
A claim for damages for inconvenience arising from breach of contract does not constitute a claim for personal injuries under section 17 of the Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973. Inconvenience is a recoverable head of general damages for breach of contract, regardless of whether the pursuer is a natural person or a body corporate, and is not to be conflated with personal injury.
Court Disposition
Appeal refused; interlocutor of the sheriff principal adhered to.
Orders
- The appeal is refused.
- The interlocutor of the sheriff principal dated 4 August 2005 is adhered to.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment