Weddell v Anderson [2013] ScotCS CSIH_34 (20 March 2013)

Weddell v Anderson [2013] ScotCS CSIH_34 (20 March 2013)

The sheriff had unfettered discretion under OCR 24.2(1A) to consider the matter at the previously fixed diet and was not obliged to fix a further diet for the appellant to state her intentions. The sheriff's decision to grant decree by default was competent given the appellant's non-appearance and the procedural history.

Citation
[2013] ScotCS CSIH_34
Parties
Defender and Appellant: Louise Weddell; Pursuer and Respondent: Ian Anderson
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
20 March 2013
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff Principal to Inner House, Court of Session
Outcome
Appeal refused
Legal Topics
Decree by Default, Withdrawal of Solicitors, Sheriff Court Rules, Judicial Discretion

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Louise Weddell

Defender and Appellant

Ian Anderson

Pursuer and Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff Principal to Inner House, Court of Session

  1. 1 Whether the sheriff was competent to grant decree by default after withdrawal of appellant's solicitors and appellant's non-appearance at diet of debate without further intimation under OCR 24.2(1)
  2. 2 Proper construction of OCR 24.2(1A) and its interplay with OCR 16.2

Ratio Decidendi

The sheriff had unfettered discretion under OCR 24.2(1A) to consider the matter at the previously fixed diet and was not obliged to fix a further diet for the appellant to state her intentions. The sheriff's decision to grant decree by default was competent given the appellant's non-appearance and the procedural history.

Court Disposition

Appeal refused

Orders

  • Decree by default stands
  • No further orders made