INQUIRY UNDER THE FATAL ACCIDENTS AND INQUIRIES (SCOTLAND) ACT 1976 INTO THE SUDDENDEATH OF BRIAN JOHN GILFILLAN [2010] ScotSC 51 (03 February 2010)

INQUIRY UNDER THE FATAL ACCIDENTS AND INQUIRIES (SCOTLAND) ACT 1976 INTO THE SUDDENDEATH OF BRIAN JOHN GILFILLAN [2010] ScotSC 51 (03 February 2010)

There were no reasonable precautions or defects in the system of work that might have avoided the death; however, there were relevant facts including misinterpretation of disciplinary policy, lack of proper training for managers, and absence of employee welfare considerations in the policy.

Citation
[2010] ScotSC 51
Parties
Deceased: Brian John Gilfillan; Prosecutor: Crown; Interested Party: NHS Fife
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
03 February 2010
Procedural Posture
Fatal Accident Inquiry / Determination
Outcome
No formal findings under reasonable precautions or defects in system of work; relevant facts identified regarding policy and training deficiencies.
Legal Topics
Disciplinary Procedures, Employee Welfare, Workplace Misconduct, Suicide in Workplace Context, Procedural Fairness
Employment Law Health and Safety Administrative Law Disciplinary Procedures Employee Welfare Workplace Misconduct Suicide in Workplace Context Procedural Fairness

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Brian John Gilfillan

Deceased

Crown

Prosecutor

NHS Fife

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Fatal Accident Inquiry / Determination

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether there were reasonable precautions whereby the death might have been avoided
  2. 2 Whether defects in any system of work contributed to the death
  3. 3 Whether there were other relevant facts to the circumstances of the death

Ratio Decidendi

There were no reasonable precautions or defects in the system of work that might have avoided the death; however, there were relevant facts including misinterpretation of disciplinary policy, lack of proper training for managers, and absence of employee welfare considerations in the policy.

Court Disposition

No formal findings under reasonable precautions or defects in system of work; relevant facts identified regarding policy and training deficiencies.